Senator Laura Thielen

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Helpful Links
    • Land Use Maps
    • Hawaii Women’s Legislative Caucus
  • Leg. 101
    • Making or Repealing Laws
    • How to Track a Bill
    • Sending Testimony Online
    • Advocating for Bills
    • Contacting Legislators
    • Legislative Timetable
    • Keiki and Government
  • Survey
  • Meetings & Events
  • About/Contact
    • About Senator Laura Thielen
    • Contact Senator Thielen
    • Sign up for Email Updates

There’s Nothing Special About Calling a Session to Bail out Rail

June 26, 2017 By Senator Laura Thielen 12 Comments

We got an email from Senate President’s office asking for our availability for a Special Session in late July/August.

The email stressed that there is no agreement on calling a Special Session or on a bill.  Yet.  But I doubt we’d be getting the email if there weren’t some level of agreement.

In May, right before we closed, I spoke out against extending any more funding for Rail because the City has not shown us (1) what the total construction cost will be, and (2) that they have changed their oversight and will now be able to manage those costs.

In response, another Senator rose and said Leeward people supported H-3 and the cost of traffic relief for Windward Oahu residents, so we need to support them.

In preparation for our upcoming Special Session, I did a little homework comparing Rail to H-3.

I’d welcome anyone fact-checking my homework, to make sure my math is right, and that I’ve made a fair comparison.  Put your corrections in the comments section, below.

I got the numbers for H-3 from a 1997 Star Advertiser article.  Just to make things simpler, I put the cost of Rail at $10 Billion – but we know it’s going to more than that.  I used a government inflation calculator to compare dollars, and put the H-3 adjustment at 1992 dollars, since that was the midpoint of construction.

If anyone wants to get into a cost per mile comparison, H-3 is 16.1 miles.

 

H-3

Rail

Cost

$1,300,000,000

$10,000,000,000

Cost Adjusted for Inflation

$2,400,000,000

$10,000,000,000

Federal Share

Adjusted for Inflation

90%

$2,160,000,000

$1,500,000,000

State Share

Adjusted for Inflation

10%

$24,000,000

$8,500,000,000

Share39
Tweet
Email
39 Shares

Filed Under: Budgets and Finances, General Legislation, State Interests; Community Interests

Comments

  1. LeeAnn Isobe says

    August 30, 2017 at 12:48 pm

    Thank you for voting against advancing the rail bill.

    Reply
  2. Philip Park says

    July 1, 2017 at 12:22 am

    It doesn’t seem likely that the rail project can help with the traffics situation very much even we’re it to be finished to UH Manoa. I would like to know what the fee for riding the rail will be. Also will there be sufficient security on unmanned cars. Can a woman safely ride the rail at night? Have these issues been addressed yet?

    Reply
  3. Ed Wagner says

    June 30, 2017 at 9:11 pm

    The chart fails to mention that the Fed Share of rail is now only 10% to 15% @ $10B and will decrease as the rail cost continues to skyrocket.

    Did anyone consider the H3 a Boondoggle like the rail? Did anyone call H3 a deliberate fraud against the people like rail has been called by many, including retired UH Law Professor Randy Roth, and myself>

    I consider it to be the biggest deliberate fraud ever perpetrated upon the people of Hawaii since statehood, all the result of having an out of control, totally unaccountable DEMOCRAT MONOPOLY government.

    Reply
  4. Hi Alohanui says

    June 30, 2017 at 5:50 pm

    Thanks, Sen. T ! Yes, H-3 was 90% federally funded and brought money into our economy. I think we will be lucky if rail ends up 5-10% federally funded if it goes to Ala Moana. The cost could reach multiples of that cost projected currently.

    I don’t get how we are building that massive infrastructure in the federal inundation zone. Isn’t it illegal ? And how is that going to work with all the electricity coming from the ground and the elevators and escalators going to the ground. Isn’t all that an electrocution risk ? And won’t rail be shut down ? Unlike buses which would just roll through the flood waters.

    Reply
  5. Hawaii Math Tutor says

    June 30, 2017 at 1:16 pm

    The final number of your chart under the H-3 heading should be $240 million, not $24 million. Other than that, you math looks right.
    Me -> http://HawaiiMathTutor.com

    Reply
  6. Natalie Iwasa says

    June 30, 2017 at 12:30 pm

    Thank you for this, Senator Thielen. Since H3 is shorter than the minimum operable segment (i.e., to Ala Moana), we could carry your analysis a step further by showing what H3 would have cost in today’s dollars for 20 miles. Based on your work, that would be just under $30 million.

    Reply
    • Natalie Iwasa says

      June 30, 2017 at 12:33 pm

      Just a slight correction — the federal share for rail is $1.55 billion.

      Reply
    • zzzzzz says

      July 1, 2017 at 9:13 pm

      According to google maps, the H-3 is about 16 miles from Kaneohe Bay Drive to H-1. Extrapolating $2.4B, its cost adjusted for inflation, for 16 miles gives us $3B for 20 miles.

      Since the Federal share was 90%, the state share would’ve been about $300M, less than it’ll probably cost to operate the train for a year.

      Is it just a coincidence that, as Randy Roth recently reminded us, the train was previously projected to cost about $3B?

      Reply
  7. zzzzzz says

    June 28, 2017 at 11:22 am

    While we know the non-federal share of the construction actually comes from the residents and visitors of Oahu, would it be more accurate to call the non-federal share a City and County share, rather than a state share?

    But since the funds come from the same source regardless of semantics, we need to look at the opportunity cost of rail. That is, what other issues could that money be addressing, and is rail a better use of those funds?

    For example, might we be better off providing a small portion of those 10+ billion dollars to UH to develop and implement a way for students from Leeward Oahu to take courses at UH-West Oahu, LCC, or at home online rather than commute to Manoa? We all know that when Manoa is not in session, or is in summer session, we don’t need whatever traffic relief rail would provide. And that could be leveraged over the entire island, providing relief to other major arteries as well, e.g., Likelike benefiting from courses taken at WCC, and even increasing neighbor island access to classes.

    And if we look beyond just completion of rail, the operating cost estimates I’ve read are about $110 million per year. Given that the initial estimate of rail construction was about $3 billion, and it’ll end up costing over $10 billion, that would suggest the cost of operating rail will be closer to $350 million per year, which is more than the rail tax is bringing in.

    That means extending the GET rail tax indefinitely won’t even be enough to pay for rail operation, much less extend the rail beyond Middle Street or Aloha Tower or however far it gets before running out of money, or before the taxpaying public runs out of patience.

    Reply
  8. Patricia Blair says

    June 26, 2017 at 8:40 pm

    The argument that Leeward people supported H-3 is immaterial. This rail project is poorly designed, over-priced, will not elievate traffic woes. It will bankrupt the city and cause undue hardship on middle and low income people. End it at Middle Street or stadium and be done with it.

    Reply
    • MJ Culvyhouze says

      June 30, 2017 at 4:06 pm

      Short and sweet, thank you!

      Reply
      • MJ Culvyhouse says

        June 30, 2017 at 6:34 pm

        Correction: Culvyhouse

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Senator Laura Thielen

State Senate District 25
Kailua, Waimanalo, Hawaii Kai
Sign up for Email Updates

Facebook  Twitter

Latest Posts

Take the survey

2019 Legislative Survey

Each year I begin the Session with a quick survey, to get input on topics that we expect will come … [Read More...]

Vote Yes on Constitutional Convention

Hawaii Constitutional Convention – It’s a Matter of Trust. And Hope.

In my last two posts, I explained why I’m voting “Yes” for a Constitutional Convention.  To be fair, … [Read More...]

Shall Hawaii Hold a ConCon? The Question Comes Down to, Do You Think the Legislature Will Resolve Hawaii’s Chronic Challenges?

Hawaii legislators are the only people who can create a state law. The Governor can’t; the Judiciary … [Read More...]

We Need a Hawaii Constitutional Convention

A State Constitutional Convention is the time for citizens to discuss big ideas that create a … [Read More...]

Why Vote? – Because Higher Voter Turnout Leads to Politicians Who Work Harder to Represent the People in their District

Hawaii has THE lowest voter turnout in the nation. “Why vote? It’s a done deal.” That’s what so … [Read More...]

Website & Comments Policy | Senator Thielen’s Blog | About/Contact | RSS Feed

Copyright © 2019 Senator Laura Thielen | All Rights Reserved | Hawaii State Capitol, Room 223 | Phone 808-587-8388 | Fax 808-587-7240 | Website Design by Hotpixels.com